Guidelines

Is It Best to Settle My Personal Injury Case Out of Court?

Advantages of Settling Out of Court

• 1. Time Efficiency: Settling cases out of court is faster, often within a year, while trials can take up to five years.
• 2. Lower Legal Fees: Settling reduces court fees, and expert witness costs, saving you more money.
• 3. Control Over Outcome: Settling lets you negotiate terms, whereas trials leave the final decision to a judge or jury.
• 4. Confidentiality: Settlements remain private, unlike trials, which are public and become part of court records.
• 5. Emotional Relief: Settling avoids the stress of a trial, including testimonies, cross-examinations, and reliving events.

Potential Downsides of Settling

• 1. Lower Compensation: Settling may lead to a lower payout than a trial, as insurance companies aim to avoid higher verdicts.
• 2. No Appeal Option: Once a case is settled, there is no option for appeal, even if new evidence or complications emerge.
• 3. No Admission of Guilt: Settlements don’t require the defendant to admit liability, which may matter for victims seeking justice.

When Going to Court May Be Necessary

• 1. Disputed Liability: If there’s disagreement about who is at fault, it may be necessary to go to court. In contested cases, a jury trial could secure a fairer outcome if the insurance company refuses to negotiate reasonably.
• 2. Severe or Long-Term Injuries: If your injuries are severe or result in long-term consequences, a court trial may offer a higher chance of securing compensation that fully covers future medical expenses, lost earning capacity, and emotional suffering. Settlements may not account for these extended factors as thoroughly.
• 3. Bad Faith Insurance Practices: If the insurance company refuses to negotiate in good faith or offers a settlement that is significantly lower than the value of your claim, taking the case to court could be necessary to get a fair outcome.

Need Help Deciding? Schedule a Consultation!